<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Msl333</id>
	<title>processdesign - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Msl333"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Msl333"/>
	<updated>2026-04-23T20:40:24Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3239</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3239"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:03:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3238</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3238"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:02:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3237</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3237"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:02:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Process Alternatives */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3236</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3236"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:02:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3235</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3235"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:01:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3233</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3233"/>
		<updated>2015-03-14T00:00:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3231</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3231"/>
		<updated>2015-03-13T23:59:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Site Conditions */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes. The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%. Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there. The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3229</id>
		<title>Natural Gas to Hydrogen (H)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Natural_Gas_to_Hydrogen_(H)&amp;diff=3229"/>
		<updated>2015-03-13T23:59:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Technical Approach Taken */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Team H Final Report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: Nick Dotzenrod, Samson Fong, Vince Kenny, Matthew Leung, Matthew Nathal, John Plaxco, Spencer Saldaña, Micah Zuckerman, Erik Zuehlke&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instructors: Fengqi You, David Wegerer,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 13, 2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Executive Summary==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As environmental concerns lead many automobile makers to use alternative fuel source, hydrogen fuel cell is increasingly attractive. However, the hydrogen needed to be used in a fuel cell requires a purity of 99.999% which is purer than most applications. As a result, there is an opportunity to produce high purity hydrogen to support this potential market. In addition, the recent natural gas boom will provide a cheap feedstock for a traditional method for hydrogen production: steam reforming. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plant is proposed to be located in Freeport, Texas to be near the East Texas Basin natural gas feedstock. It will be able to produce the hydrogen at 100 MMscfd (Million standard cubic feet per day), a relatively high capacity plant especially for such high purity hydrogen. In addition to the feedstock, the location also has a low corporate tax rate reducing annual costs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process, after desulfurization, utilizes the natural gas feed by combining it with steam. The mixture is then passed through a reactor filled with catalysts, resulting in a mixture of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen. The subsequent water gas shift and separation units (amine plant) remove the impurity to result in highly pure hydrogen. Any wastewater produced will be sent for off-site treatment. The steam reforming process is industrially mature. As a result, there is no unknowns in the process as it is very well characterized. This reduces down time and risk and ensure the safety of the workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to make this process as efficient as possible, several key parameters are optimized. For instance, a large part of the operating cost is due to utility costs. As a result, heat exchangers were included and placed optimally to take advantage of the heat produced to reduce the necessary heating by a furnace. In addition, to reduce the need to treat the impure unconverted gases, they are burned as fuel. Finally, the size of the amine plant and the specific amine used are also optimized for this application of high purity hydrogen production. &lt;br /&gt;
In addition to optimizing the process, an optimization to the process equipment has also been done. The design goal is generally to use the most industrially mature process to reduce risk of failure and maximize uptime. In addition, when there are several competing technologies, the cheapest, high-throughput capable option is selected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total capital cost of this proposed plant is $62.6 million. Annually, the plant is predicted to have a revenue of $748 million (assuming 360 days operation to allow for holiday vacations). In addition, the plant will cost $359 million to operate, resulting in $2.11 billion of profit after 10 years. The simple payback period is 0.161 years with a return on investment of 6.21. Financially, the cheap feedstock and process make this project highly profitable. While the economic analysis is only done for the first ten years, the plant is expected to remain in operation for 25 to 50 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the need to become less reliant on fossil fuels grows, the idea of widespread hydrogen fuel cells comes closer to being a reality. Hydrogen-fueled vehicles produce no direct pollution, making them environmentally friendly. However, fossil fuels are often used in the processes for the hydrogen production and the energy content of the produced hydrogen is less than that of the fossil fuels used (Clay et al. 2004; Actual Worldwide, 2007). To successfully implement a change to hydrogen fuel, high capacity plants must be constructed to meet increased demand. With the increased production of natural gas and the corresponding drop in price, steam reforming is a profitable method to produce hydrogen. The goal of this project is to design, optimize, and economically analyze a steam reforming process that will produce 99.999% hydrogen from a feedstock of natural gas. Waste products such as carbon dioxide, waste water, and monoethanolamine will be treated to minimize environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technical Approach Taken== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After investigating process alternatives for each of the design stages, the final technologies chosen to achieve the specified design criteria were chosen by comparing the advantages and disadvantages as well as considering factors unique to the proposed design. The major decision was to use steam reforming to generate the hydrogen. The specific type of steam reformation chosen was conventional steam reforming due to capacity constraints. A nickel catalyst was chosen due to its low cost. To treat the CO waste, both methanation and a water gas shift were selected to ensure product purity. Amine scrubbing was picked to separate carbon dioxide from the product stream. Finally, pressure swing adsorption was chosen to handle separation of the methane from hydrogen. Several process design options were investigated to determine the most economically favorable and environmentally neutral design. The three major processes used for hydrogen production evaluated were steam reforming, partial oxidation, and autothermal reforming. Various technology options including reactor types, catalysts, and separation methods were compared to find the optimal combination of reliability, sustainability, profitability, and versatility. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Peng-Robinson fluid package was chosen for use in the HYSYS simulation because it is ideal for describing hydrocarbon systems such as the steam methane reforming plant, where most components are gases or are nonpolar. Furthermore, Peng-Robinson is reliable over a large range of operating temperatures and pressures, which encompass those within our system. The amine plant portion of the simulation uses the amine package. This package is based on the Kent-Eisenberg model specifically designed for modeling removal of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; and H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;S by amines. &lt;br /&gt;
Difficulties encountered modeling adsorption processes in HYSYS lead to the use of component splitters to model the feed pretreatment and pressure swing adsorption (PSA) steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Site Conditions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposed plant will be located in Freeport, Texas, a port city in Brazoria County. Texas was chosen as the site for the plant because of its lack of corporate and individual income taxes as well as its low sales and property taxes.12 The sales tax rate in Freeport is 8.25% and the property tax rate is approximately 0.5%.13 Furthermore, the presence of the Dow Chemical Company’s Texas Operations facility in Freeport ensures that the proper utilities infrastructure will be available. Texas was rated as the best state for business in 2014, which further motivated the decision to locate the plant there.4 The climate of Freeport is classified as humid subtropical. This ensures continuous production with little climate effects on the plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Steam Reforming Process==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pre-treatment zone desulfurizes the hydrocarbon feed. Then, it is combined with superheated process steam. Afterwards, this mixture is heated and passes through reformer tubes filled with catalyst (Hydrogen Production, 2004). The reformer tubes are also heated which causes the hydrocarbon and steam mixture to react, yielding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen (Steam Reforming, 2014). The water gas shift then converts the carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and generates hydrogen. The plant is normally operated with a higher steam content than required to prevent elemental carbon from being deposited in the catalyst bed (Steam Reforming, 2014). The pressure swing adsorption will isolate the hydrogen desired from any residual gases that are later used as fuel. Figure 1 below shows the process flow diagram of the process. The stream and vessel number descriptions are found in Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Flow Diagram==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenflowsheet.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 1. Process Flow Diagram of the Hydrogen Reforming Process]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Process Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Three primary techniques are used to produce hydrogen from a hydrocarbon source, such as methane. The techniques are: steam reforming, autothermal reforming, and partial oxidation.&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these techniques has advantages and disadvantages which must be considered in choosing a final design.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: industrially mature, no oxygen needed, lowest process operation temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantage: large volume of air emissions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:;Autothermal reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantage: low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: requires air/oxygen, little commercial experience&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Partial oxidation&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: no catalyst needed, needs less desulfurization, low methane slip&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: high process temperatures, process has high a degree of complexity, poor hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam reforming is the most appropriate technique for the proposed design due to its high degree of industrial maturity and safe operating conditions.  Although partial oxidation and autothermal reforming each have distinct advantages, the lack of maturity for both of these processes would add a high degree of risk to the overall plant design. Furthermore, the lower operation temperature of steam reforming will result in a safer process (Holiday et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
 	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five methods of steam reforming that would provide the necessary purity for hydrogen cars are the conventional box method, conventional can method, the compact steam methane reformers, plate-type steam methane reformers, and membrane reactor steam reforming.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional box steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Conventional reforming can handle a large throughput such as the 100 MMscfd. The desired 99.99% purity is achieved after the water-gas shift and pressure swing adsorption (Ogden, 2002).6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Temperatures of 750-800 °C are needed in the reactor. The utility costs associated with this method are high (Schoerner et al. 2011).7&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Conventional can steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Can be quickly constructed for fast start up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Only cost efficient at throughputs under 10 MMscfd so multiple would need to be used (Schoerner et al. 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Compact steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Concentric annular catalyst beds can produce the 99.999% purity which is more pure than required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: Produce 1 MMscfd and, therefore, this alternative is unable to handle the throughput of the plant being designed (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Plate-type steam methane reformers&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: Plate-type steam reformers are less expensive, more efficient, and have faster startups than conventional methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages: The catalysts used are extremely sensitive to carbon deposition and sulfur poisoning. Implementing this process is more risky as it is not yet being used commercially (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
:;Membrane reactors for steam reforming&lt;br /&gt;
::Advantages: This method produces extremely pure product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Disadvantages:  Membrane reactors require temperatures 200 °C greater than conventional methods and does not work effectively at the large scale desired (Ogden, 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After taking all the processes into consideration, the conventional box steam reformer is the most appropriate choice for the plant being designed as it will yield the desired purity and can produce the 100 MMscfd desired.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Technology Options==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Reactor and Catalyst Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Of the several process alternatives described above, steam reforming is the most developed technology for hydrogen production. However, there are different ways to carry out the process of steam reforming. The alternatives focus on the choice of catalyst and the configuration of the catalyst in the reactor.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally, catalysts can be categorized as non-precious metal (such as nickel) and precious metal (such as platinum and rhodium). The cost of non-precious metal catalysts is substantially lower, but the catalyst is also far less effective. Nevertheless, conventional steam reforming plants usually use nickel catalysts because heat and mass transfer effects generally dominate the reaction kinetics with an effectiveness factor as low as 5% (Adris and Pruden, 1996).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the heat and mass transfer effects, some processes attempt to reduce the particle size of catalysts and increase the reaction area by using microchannel-based reactors (Wang et al. 2004). As the size of the catalyst particle decreases, the apparent kinetics of reaction converge to the intrinsic kinetic of the catalyst. As a result, the more expensive precious metal catalysts are favored (Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003). Currently, researchers are developing cobalt-based catalysts to mitigate the cost of rhodium based catalysts (Song et al. 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carbon Monoxide Removal Alternatives===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The steam reforming process produces approximately 5% of carbon monoxide in the product stream. Water-gas shift and methanation are two most common method to improve purity (Song, 2002). Water-gas shift reacts carbon monoxide and water to form hydrogen and carbon dioxide. In order to prevent the oxidation of hydrogen, precise control of air input is needed. Conventionally, the product stream is passed through a high temperature reactor because the reaction is substantially faster at higher temperature, but it is then passed through a low temperature reactor to improve hydrogen production (Hoogers, 2003). TeGrotenhuis et al. (2002) have demonstrated that a single reactor with a gradient temperature that spans both ends of the temperature extremes can be used in order to reduce the utility used. While copper catalysts are most prevalent, increased selectivity can be achieved with higher cost molybdenum carbide or platinum-based catalysts (Patt et al. 2000; Chandler et al. 200).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another process to reduce carbon monoxide is methanation. Similar to water-gas shift, methanation reacts carbon monoxide and hydrogen to form methane and water. Methanation reactors are generally simpler without the need for a precise air stream. However, the reaction fundamentally consumes hydrogen at a very high rate (3 moles of hydrogen are consumed for 1 mole of carbon monoxide consumed) (Hoogers, 2003). A combination of both methods is generally used for high purity hydrogen production, which is appropriate for the proposed design. As such, both a water-gas shift as well as methanation will be utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===Acid Gas Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
After the water gas shift, the product stream will be enriched in carbon dioxide and methane in order to remove carbon monoxide. The two stack gases will be separated in two steps. Carbon dioxide is an acid gas, which is generally removed by adsorption using an amine solvent (Kohl and Nielson, 1997). The product stream is passed through an absorber with the amine solvent where the carbon dioxide is stripped. The amine, now rich in carbon dioxide is then passed through a regenerator where the acid gas is separated from the amine (Miller and Zawacki, 1978). This process is referred to as amine scrubbing.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Other technologies that are used for acid gas removal include using a membrane to separate the acid gas and vacuum swing separation. Membrane gas separation however is still not mature enough for widespread usage today (Baker, 2002). Another alternative is to use vacuum swing adsorption. The feed gas is passed through a parallel adsorption bed where the carbon dioxide is adsorbed. The bed is then rinsed with a stream rich in carbon dioxide to remove any methane or hydrogen trapped in the bed. The pressure within the adsorber is then lowered to further the separation of the gases (Wang, 1989). Due to the complexity of the vacuum swing adsorption, and the immaturity of membrane separation, using an amine solvent for amine scrubbing is the method of choice for removing the carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Methane Removal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two potential methods of separating methane from hydrogen and water are membrane gas separation and pressure swing adsorption. Membrane gas separation is the less mature and reliable of these technologies. It involves the use of either a porous or non-porous membrane in order to selectively separate gas components primarily on size and affinity. Synthetic membranes are contained in either hollow fiber bundles, spiral wound bundles, or plates (Yun and Oyama, 1989).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) selectively adsorbs gas components by rapidly pressurizing and depressurizing a gas around adsorbents. Species are adsorbed at high pressure and the adsorbents can be regenerated by and series of purging and desorbing at low pressures (What is PSA, 2015). Common adsorbent materials are zeolites, molecular sieves, silica gel, alumina, and activated carbon. PSA operates at near-ambient temperatures and is the most widely accepted method of large scale hydrogen purification (Strasse, 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key Processes and Products==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major processing steps involved in the steam methane reformation process as designed. These major processing stages are: the initial heating of feed, the steam reformation reactor, the high and low temperature water shift reactors, the amine plant, the methanation reactor, the gas compression and cooling train, and the pressure swing adsorption unit.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From the heating of the feed, the combustion of hydrocarbons to provide heat yields carbon dioxide as a major byproduct. The product of this process is the heated feed which contains methane and water. The main product of the steam reformation reactor contains methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, water, and methane. This product goes to the shift reactors where the outgoing product will contain less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide than that from the steam reformation reactor, but will otherwise contain similar components. The product from the shift reactors is sent to an amine plant where the acid gas (Carbon Dioxide) will be removed and vented to the atmosphere as waste product, resulting in a product stream containing carbon monoxide, methane, hydrogen, and water. This stream is sent to the methanation reactor where the carbon monoxide is broken down into oxygen and carbon which yields a product stream containing water, methane, and hydrogen. This stream is then sent to the compression system where the pressure is increased so that pressure swing adsorption may be used to separate the methane and hydrogen. From the pressure swing adsorption unit, the purified hydrogen is removed and sent to a storage tank to be sold later and the methane captured is then recycled back to the gas fired heater. For more details on the products in each flow, see Appendix A.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Equipment Sizing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two sources were used to size the equipment and estimate capital costs. The first was the Aspen HYSYS integrated economics evaluator. Carbon steel was the chosen material for use in the furnace, pumps, and pipes. All components were sized with a 10% pressure safety margin or 25 psi greater than the operating conditions (whichever value was higher) in order to provide a potential buffer in case of an increase in temperature or pressure. This resulted in moderately higher prices, but no expense was spared due to safety concerns. The reactors were sized using methods described in Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Since the PSA columns could not be modeled in HYSYS, individual suppliers were contacted to achieve the required plant capacity. Using empirical correlations, the capital cost was estimated for six PSA columns, shown in Appendix B. The equipment sizes (diameter, etc.) for certain equipment utilized in the process are shown in Appendix C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Analysis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Capital Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $6.26 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 shows the annual operating costs for the process. More detail on how these costs were calculated can be found in Appendix D.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin: auto;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;| Table 1: Annual Operating Costs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Process Expense&lt;br /&gt;
! Yearly Cost ($)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Waste Treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|1.86 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Utilities &lt;br /&gt;
|2.98 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1.80 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1.88 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Feedstock Purchase&lt;br /&gt;
|3.07 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Total Annual Operating Cost: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;   $3.59 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The water will be sold at $0.00207 per kilogram (Freeport Water, 2014). Methane will be purchased for $0.226 per kilogram (U.S. EIA, 2015). MEA will be purchased for $0.50 per kilogram (Alibaba, 2015a). Hydrogen fuel will be sold for roughly $10/kg (O’Dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $7.48 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;8&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Simple Payback Period: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  0.161 years&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Return on Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  6.21&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Profit after 10 years: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $2.11 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;9&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
An NPV analysis was conducted to calculate the after-tax profits for the plant, taking into account variable depreciation as well as differing taxable income thresholds. The results can be seen below in Figure 2. Appendix E shows the calculation of the economic analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:hydrogenNPV.png|thumb|800px|center| Figure 2. NPV and Profit by year]]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
==Optimization==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers were implemented where applicable to help reduce utility costs. The air flow into the heater was adjusted to the optimal level so that the heat necessary for the reaction was achieved and the savings from reduced fuel levels were greater than the additional cost of pumping air into the furnace. The temperature in the steam methane reformer was optimized to yield the quantity of hydrogen that provides the most revenue with respect to the amount of energy needed to heat the reformer. Optimization was also introduced by burning the unconverted gases that were separated as a result of PSA (Caventi et al. 2004). This saved money since the cost of recycling the unconverted gases back through the reformer again would be high due to the need for repressurization. The amine chosen for the process was also an area for optimization. Many amines will perform the job adequately, however, monoethanolamine (MEA) was chosen. MEA is cheap and since the process requires a large amount of purging, a cheap, effective amine is more viable than a more expensive one (Dow Chemical, 2003). Additionally, the sizes of the towers in the amine plant were increased to allow for more continuous operation, as it could operate for greater periods of time in between purges. Optimization allowed the required MEA feed to be reduced from 50000 kilomoles/hour to 9000 kilomoles/hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion and Recommended Design Improvements==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
With a simple payback period of 0.161 years and a return on investment of 6.21, the process is quite profitable and it is recommended to move forwards with the design. After conducting several rounds of optimization, however, it was determined that further improvements should be investigated to lower the required MEA in the amine plant and thereby reduce the major feedstock cost. This proposed plant has economic value and although the model only simulates the first 10 years of operation, the plant is expected to operate for 25 to 50 years given its capacity and robust design. This plant can sustain demand as the hydrogen market continues to grow in the United States and globally. Recommended design improvements include increasing the amount of amine recycled will lower feed costs, as this is one of the more expensive starting products utilized. Also, further optimization in the pressure swing adsorption to minimize costs, specifically the operational costs from the amount of energy utilized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actual Worldwide Hydrogen Production. 2007; http://www.fair-pr.de/background/worldwide-hydrogen-production-analysis.php. Accessed 1/15/2015, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adris AM, Pruden BB. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 177&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Coco fatty acid monoethanolamine CMEA 85% 97%.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Coco-fatty-acid-monoethanolamine-CMEA-85_60179238235.html Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alibaba. Zibo Zeolite 3A, 4A, 5A, 13x Molecular Sieve in chemical adsorbent.  http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Zibo-Zeolite-3A-4A-5A-13x_1183694288.html?s=p  Accessed 3/3/2015&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Baker RW. &amp;quot;Future Directions of Membrane Gas Separation Technology&amp;quot; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, volume 41, pages 1393-1411.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cavenati S, Grande C, Rodrigues A. Adsorption Equilibrium of Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Nitrogen on Zeolite 13X at High Pressures. Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. 2004; 49(4):1095-1101.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandler BD, Schabel AB, Pignolet LH, Journal of Catalysis 193 (2000) 186–198.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ChE 351 Handout: Economic Evaluation of Projects: How Much is Our Idea Worth? 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clay A. Boyce, MaCarr, Howe-Baker. Time for a New Hydrogen Plant? 2004. http://www.cbi.com/images/uploads/technical_articles/CBI_HydrocarbonEngineering_Feb04.pdf Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dow Chemical Company. Monoethanolamine, Diethanolamine, Triethanolamine. http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_017d/0901b8038017d302.pdf?filepath=amines/pdfs/noreg/111-01375.pdf&amp;amp;fromPage=GetDoc  1/1/2003.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Freeport Water &amp;amp; Sewer Rates. City of Freeport, TX. 2014. Accessed 10/5/2014.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holiday JD, Hu J, et al. An Overview of Hydrogen Production Technologies. Catalysis Today. 2007; 139(4):244-260.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoogers G. Fuel Cell Technology Handbook, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2003) pp. 5-&lt;br /&gt;
1–5-23.&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen Production – Steam Methane Reforming (SMR). 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, NY. 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knaebel, K. A “How To” Guide for Adsorber Design. http://userpages.umbc.edu/~dfrey1/ench445/AdsorberDes2.pdf  Accessed 3/3/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kohl A, Nielson R. Gas Purification (5th ed.). Gulf Publishing (1997)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Miller LN, Zawacki TS. &amp;quot;Process for acid gas removal from gaseous mixtures&amp;quot;, issued 21 Mar 1978, assigned to Institute of Gas Technology&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O&#039;Dell J. 8 Things You Need To Know About Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Cars. http://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy/8-things-you-need-to-know-about-hydrogen-fuel-cell-cars.html. Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ogden JM. Review of Small Stationary Reformers for Hydrogen Production Princeton, NJ: Princeton University; 2002. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/31948.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L. Catalysis Letters 65 (2000) 193–195.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rostrup-Nielsen J, in: I.T. Horvath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Catalysis, Wiley Inter-science, (2003) 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schoerner W, GS, Musich N. Selecting the Right Steam Methane Reformer: Can vs. Box Design. 2011. http://www.hydrocarbonprocessing.com/Article/2941986/Selecting-the-right- steam-methane-reformer-Can-vs-box-design.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song CS, Catalysis Today 77 (2002) 17–49&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Song H, Zhang L, Ozkan US. Green Chemistry 9 (2007) 686–694&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Steam Reforming. 2014. http://www.linde-engineering.com/en/process_plants /hydrogen and_ synthesis_gas_plants/gas_generation/steam_reforming/index.html. Accessed 1/13/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strasse, C.L. Hydrogen Recovery by Pressure Swing Adsorption. Linde Engineering 1/1/12. http://www.linde-engineering.com/internet.global.lindeengineering.global/en/images/HA_H_1_1_e_12_150dpi19_6130.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TeGrotenhuis WE, King DL, Brooks KP, Golladay BJ, Wegeng RS, in: Baselt JP, Eul U, Wegeng RS (Eds.). Optimizing Microchannel Reactors by Trading- Off Equilibrium and Reaction Kinetics Through Temperature Management, AICHE, New Orleans, LA, 2002, p. 18.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler G, Sinnott R. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design. 2nd ed. Boston: Elsevier; 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. EIA. What is the average price of natural gas for electric-power-generation?.  http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=51&amp;amp;t=8 . Accessed 3/2/2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang HI; Koch WR, assignee. Patent 4869894. Hydrogen Generation and Recovery.  26 Sept. 1989. Print.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang Y, Chin Y, Rozmiarek RT, Watson J, Tonkovich ALY. Catalysis Today 98 (2004) 575–581.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is PSA? Xebec Adsorption Inc. http://www.xebecinc.com/technology-what-is-psa.php. Accessed 1/30/15.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yun S, Oyama S. Correlations in palladium membranes for hydrogen separation: A review. Journal of Membrane Science. 1989; 375(1-2):28-45.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix A: Stream and Vessel Number Descriptions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 2 – Stream Number Descriptions&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table2streams.png|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Streams 100-117 are process cooling water streams for heat exchangers, the even numbered streams are the cooling water source and the odd numbered streams are the heated cooling water.&lt;br /&gt;
Stream 200 is process steam for heating in the reboiler and stream 201 is the steam condensate from amine reboiler.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 3 – Equipment Number Descriptions &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table3equip.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix B: Pressure Swing Adsorption Sizing == &lt;br /&gt;
(Rostrup-Nielsen, 2003) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PSA Inlet Conditions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*5539 kmol/hour &lt;br /&gt;
*296.2 °C&lt;br /&gt;
*25 bar&lt;br /&gt;
*90.1% H2&lt;br /&gt;
*6.28% H2O&lt;br /&gt;
*1.82% CH4&lt;br /&gt;
*0.0026% CO2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Assumptions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*Cycle time: 10 min&lt;br /&gt;
*L/D = 4&lt;br /&gt;
*Bulk density of zeolite 5A: 660 kg/m3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5539 kmol/hr. = 2.147 x 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; kg/hr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.147×〖10〗^4  kg/hr((.468 kg H_2)/kg)((1 hr)/(6 cycles))(1/(.05 wt% load))(( 〖1 m〗^3)/(660 kg))(1/(0.85 (zeolite packing))) = 60 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assume 2 sets of 3 columns &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
30/3 = 10 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 + .1*10 = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Pressure: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;25 bar * (1.1) = 27.5 bar = 400 psi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Design Temperature: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;296 ºC + 50 ºF = 616 ºF&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As L=4D &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volume = pi*D&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = 11 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; → D=1.5 m &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoop Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52m)/(2*12.2*.85-1.2*.4ksi)=0.03 m   ← highest stress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m )/(4*12.2*0.85+0.8*.4 ksi)=0.15 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Choose a hemispherical head for high pressure vessel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemispherical Head Stress: (0.4 ksi*1.52 m)/(4*12.2*.85-.4*0.4ksi)=0.0147 m&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of sides: pi*D*L = 29.03 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surface area of hemispheres: 4*pi*R&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 7.26 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total surface area: 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
0.03 m x 36.29 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;  = 1.08 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.08 m^3  ((7850 kg)/m^3 )=8547 kg carbon steel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Towler correlation for pressure vessel (p. 323)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
C = a + bS&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11600 + 34(8547)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;0.85&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; = $103,000 per column&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6 columns → $618,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix C - Equipment Specifications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 4 – Specifications for Process Equipment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Table4specs.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix D: Cost Estimation Details==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
All calculations were made assuming the process will be operated for 24 hours a day, 360 days a year (to allow for holiday vacations).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Utilities: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $29,817,760/yr. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Waste Treatment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $3,099,850/year at a cost of 1.5 dollars per metric ton (Towler and Sinnot, 2013). Calculated by summing up the total waste from the process on a yearly basis and multiplying by the cost per metric ton.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Labor: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $6,750,000/year. This value was obtained using the following assumptions:&lt;br /&gt;
*One operator per operation unit paid $50,000/year&lt;br /&gt;
*Approximately 15 operation units (major units such as columns and reactors)&lt;br /&gt;
*3 eight-hour shifts per operation unit (covers 24 hours of operation/day)&lt;br /&gt;
*20% fudge factor on operator and supervisor wages to account for bonuses and overtime&lt;br /&gt;
*2 supervisors per eight-hour shift (1 for each portion of the plant)&lt;br /&gt;
*Supervisor pay is 25% of the total labor costs for operators.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Materials: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $307,000,000/yr. Obtained by finding the yearly amount of water, methane, and MEA needed and multiplying by the price of water, methane, and MEA (Alibaba, 2015b).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Maintenance: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $1,877,743/yr. This value was estimated as 3% of the capital cost (ChE 351 Handout, 2014).&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Capital Investment: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;  $62,591,460. This value was obtained from the HYSYS economic analysis function.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Yearly Revenue: &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; $747,619,200/yr. Calculated by multiplying the cost of hydrogen per kilogram by the plant’s yearly output of hydrogen in kilograms (O’dell, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendix E: Economic Calculations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simple Payback Period: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP=(initial cost)/(annual benefits-annual costs)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP =62591460/(748000000-359000000) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
			&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;SP = 0.161years&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Return on Investment: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;ROI=  (annual benefits-annual costs)/(initial cost)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI =1/SP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; ROI = 6.21&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 5: Net Present Value: &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File: Table5npv.PNG|thumb|800px|center]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3064</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3064"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:07:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment (Mecklenburgh, 1985).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mecklenburgh JC. Process plant layout. New York: Halsted Press; 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3063</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3063"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:07:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Coolers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment (Mecklenburgh, 1985).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3062</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3062"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:06:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Types of Heat Exchangers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment (Mecklenburgh, 1985).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3061</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3061"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:06:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Heat Exchangers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment. (Mecklenburgh, 1985)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types) (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation (Towler and Sinnott, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration (Peters et al., 2002).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3060</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3060"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:04:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Heat Exchangers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. (Towler and Sinnott, 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment. (Mecklenburgh, 1985)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler and Sinnott, 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area. (Peters et al., 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler and Sinnott, 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. (Towler and Sinnott, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation. (Peters et al., 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation. (Towler and Sinnott, 2013)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters et al., 2002)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3059</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=3059"/>
		<updated>2015-03-08T03:00:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* References */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR. Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Scraped-surface.jpg&amp;diff=2557</id>
		<title>File:Scraped-surface.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Scraped-surface.jpg&amp;diff=2557"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:10:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2556</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2556"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:09:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Scraped-Surface */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:scraped-surface.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2555</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2555"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:07:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Gasketed and Welded Plate */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (wassertech.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Gasket.jpg&amp;diff=2554</id>
		<title>File:Gasket.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Gasket.jpg&amp;diff=2554"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:07:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2553</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2553"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:06:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Gasketed and Welded Plate */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:gasket.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2552</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2552"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:05:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2551</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2551"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:05:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|center|300px|Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|center|300px|Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2550</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2550"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:04:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039; (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2549</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2549"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:02:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Heat Exchangers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2547</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2547"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T21:02:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2545</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2545"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:59:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2544</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2544"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:58:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1: Advantages and Disadvantages of Double Pipe Heat Exchangers (Leung, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Advantages	&lt;br /&gt;
!Disadvantages	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Simple to operate	&lt;br /&gt;
|Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer	&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs	&lt;br /&gt;
|Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Suppliers easily found globally	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|High pressure and temperatures are withstanded	&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2541</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2541"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:54:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2540</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2540"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:53:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|mid|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2539</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2539"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:53:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|middle|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2538</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2538"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:52:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Plate */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2537</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2537"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:52:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Plate */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 9 : Plate heat exchangers (heat-exchangers.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2536</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2536"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:51:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Spiral Plate and Tube */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 8 : Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2535</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2535"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:51:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Gasketed and Welded Plate */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 7 : Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Scraped-Surface_Heat_Exchanger.gif&amp;diff=2534</id>
		<title>File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Scraped-Surface_Heat_Exchanger.gif&amp;diff=2534"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:50:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: Msl333 uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Diagram of Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.rheoheat.se/images_heat/cutaway2.gif&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
from RheoHeat&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2533</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2533"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:49:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Scraped-Surface */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2532</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2532"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:49:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Scraped-Surface */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 6 : Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2531</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2531"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:49:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Shell-and-Tube */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 5: Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2530</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2530"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:48:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2529</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2529"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:48:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2528</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2528"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:47:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 4 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2527</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2527"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:46:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2526</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2526"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:46:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2525</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2525"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:46:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2524</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2524"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:45:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3: Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 : Double Pipe Counter-Current Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2523</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2523"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:45:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Double Pipe */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 3 : Double Pipe Parallel Flow (Encyclopedia.org)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Fouling.jpg&amp;diff=2520</id>
		<title>File:Fouling.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Fouling.jpg&amp;diff=2520"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:41:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2519</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2519"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:40:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Operational Maintenance */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fouling.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2: Fouled heat exchanger (regonline.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2518</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2518"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:39:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Thermal and hydraulic requirements */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1: Turbo heat exchanger (process-heating.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Rotary.jpg&amp;diff=2517</id>
		<title>File:Rotary.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=File:Rotary.jpg&amp;diff=2517"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:37:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2516</id>
		<title>Heat Transfer Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://design.cbe.cornell.edu/index.php?title=Heat_Transfer_Equipment&amp;diff=2516"/>
		<updated>2015-02-28T20:35:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Msl333: /* Thermal and hydraulic requirements */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Authors: David Chen,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2014] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Brandon Muncy,&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and Matthew Leung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt; [2015] &amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date Presented: January 13, 2014 /Date Revised: January 14, 2014 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Table of Contents --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Basic Concept=&lt;br /&gt;
There are three mechanisms of heat transfer: conduction, convection, and radiation. In most heat exchangers, convection will be the dominant mechanism. Conduction and radiation will generally be negligible in large heat exchangers, but radiation will be important in fired heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer across a surface by convection is given by the equation:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=UAF\Delta T_m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat transferred per unit time (energy/time)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = overall heat-transfer coefficient (energy/time-area-temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = heat-exchange area (area)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = correction factor (unitless)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = log mean temperature difference or the temperature driving force, (temperature)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta T _m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the driving force for a pure countercurrent contact pattern in a tubular system. the correction factor &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used because most heat exchangers do not implement true countercurrent contact. Design equations for heat exchangers will use generally use some form of this equation with the appropriate modifications to account for different configurations and approximations. (Towler)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heat Exchangers=&lt;br /&gt;
Process equipment and streams will need to be heated or cooled. One way to reduce consumption of utilities is to exchange heat between these streams. For example, if a product stream requires cooling, the excess heat can be used to preheat a feed stream that requires heating by using an appropriate heat exchanger. Here the costs of an additional heating and additional cooling unit are eliminated, and replaced by the cost of a heat exchanger. The associated utility requirements of the additional units are also eliminated and replaced by the utility requirements of operating the heat exchanger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally shell-and-tube heat exchangers in chemical industry. Standards and codes by TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association) and ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Factors to Consider==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat exchanger must meet certain physical requirements both to carry out the specified heat exchange and operate properly as part of a system. As such, it must provide the correct area for the specified heat exchange while maintaining a reasonable pressure drop, contain the pressure of the streams, prevent leaks between the tubes and the shell, account or thermal expansion, allow for cleaning of fouling deposits, allow for thermal expansion, and phase changes in certain applications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that heat exchangers rarely operate at the exact conditions specified for design. Because performance will decrease with fouling, a heat exchanger may be initially overdesigned, and after some amount of fouling, underdesigned, at which point cleaning should take place. Depending on the performance of a heat exchanger at any given time, downstream processes may be affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermal and hydraulic requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
A certain amount of energy needs to be exchanged, and the pressure drop across the heat exchanger must be accounted for in the context of the process. It may be acceptable, or may need to be maintained using pumps. The key tradeoff in heat exchangers is the heat exchanged vs. pressure drop. More surface area can always be added, but the pressure drop may become unacceptable for downstream processes. The thermal difference in the two fluids should also be considered in picking the proper heat transfer equipment, as some materials and types of heat exchangers accept larger temperature differences while others are not as efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Rotary.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Material compatibility=== &lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers must be able to maintain acceptable performance through prolonged contact in the materials with which heat is being exchanged. While regular maintenance and cleaning is unavoidable, appropriate construction materials should be chosen that are not prone to excessive corrosion or fouling. In addition, there is a certain tradeoff between costs and safety. Materials that are chosen with poor specifications to the given heat transfer application will see leakage, fouling, and possible brittleness (through temperature changes). This will lead to potential loss of material through leaks and even explosions. Material compatability is one of the most important parts in designing a heat exchanger. It is generally worth investing in a quality material that costs more upfront, as maintenance, repair, and cleaning costs will be much cheaper later on, offsetting the higher initial costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Operational Maintenance=== &lt;br /&gt;
Fouling on the heat transfer surface will reduce the overall heat transfer coefficient and efficiency. To maintain economical operation, the fouling will need to be periodically removed. Depending on the type of heat exchanger used, it may be disassembled and cleaned, or it will have to remain intact and be cleaned chemically, which can involve hazardous materials. Some heat exchangers are more easily disassembled and cleaned, while others are not. This trait will lead to a significant increase (or decrease) in costs. Depending on the application of the heat exchanger, it may be more vital to constantly check the amount of residue buildup in the exchanger, as this may lead to leakages, malfunctions, or explosions. There should be valves and other process controls that can monitor the current status of the exchanger, which will alert the operator to know when it is time to perform a maintenance checkup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmental, health, and safety considerations and regulations===&lt;br /&gt;
Hazards and toxicity of the streams involved must be guarded against, and safety codes must be met. Plans must be prepared to deal with leaks or failures of the heat exchanger that will minimize adverse effects. Any hazardous waste should be taken care of using proper protocol, and at the very least adhering to the guidelines of the laws in the area. However, ethics do not stop at national borders, so one must be very careful when dealing with toxic waste, especially in a populated area or ecologically rich area. Safety of the operators and workers should always be prioritized, and at no point should anyone be in any danger. If this is the case, then there needs to be a major change in the plant procedure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Availability and cost===&lt;br /&gt;
As with any project, the ability of the heat exchanger construction to fall within the deadlines and costs is key to the economics. Each material used to construct the heat exchanger should be properly examined for how it reacts and handles the liquids/gases that will be involved in heat transfer. There is a significant trade off between cost of material and safety. Analysis on what the required specifications in the given heat transfer application is vital to correctly identifying the correct material to use. In addition to the capital fixed costs in obtaining the heat transfer equipment, one should also analyze the variable costs. For example, the cost for the energy required to perform the proper amount of heat transfer as well as the repairing and maintaining costs of the exchanger when there is residue buildup.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Heat Exchangers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double Pipe=== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:process-flow-douple-pipe.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The double-pipe heat exchanger is one of the simplest heat exchangers utilized in industry. This exchanger&#039;s name comes from how one fluid flows inside a pipe and the other fluid flows between that pipe and another pipe that surrounds the first, essentially a &amp;quot;tube within a tube.&amp;quot; One way to improve heat transfer is to add fins on the outside of the inner tube. This is used to improve the heat transfer of a fluid with a low heat transfer coefficient such as a viscous liquid or a gas, which is passed on the outer side. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two flow configurations that can be used using a double pipe heat exchanger. These are co-current flow and counter current flow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Double Pipe Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Co-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In co-current flow, also known as parallel flow, the two fluids that are exchanging heat are flowing in the same direction. Co-current flow is generally employed when there is less heat transfer required, as this method has a lower heat transfer coefficient. However, this flow is used much less than counter-current flow in industry, as this method is not as efficient given the capital costs used in purchasing the equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Counter-Current Flow&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The counter current flow mechanism is used for condensing, gas cooling, and liquid-liquid applications. Here, the fluids flow against each other in opposite directions. In the industry, counter current movement is used more often, as there is a higher rate of heat transfer. This method maximizes the temperature differences between the tube side and shell side fluids, resulting in more heat transfer and less surface area given a constant duty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are advantages of utilizing a double pipe heat exchanger. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple to operate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Relatively simple structure with large amount of heat transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to maintain and repair if damaged or fouling residue incurs&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Suppliers easily found globally&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- High pressure and temperatures are withstanded&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Disadvantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Higher duties see a significant increase in pricing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Inspection of shell side of the tubes for damage is difficult&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Having only two single flow areas leads to low fluid flow rates&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Applications&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers can withstand high pressures and temperature. They also do not have high surface area requirements, making them economically feasible for many different applications. Double pipe heat exchangers are also used where abrasive materials are present, smaller duties, and high fouling applications, such as slurries. A more common configuration of the double pipe is with modular U-tubes in a “hairpin” configuration to conserve space. &lt;br /&gt;
Double pipe heat exchangers have lower efficiencies compared to other heat exchangers such as the shell and tube, which has led to a decline in use in industry. However, the simplicity of the double pipe heat exchanger allows its design to be studied by students much easier, and is generally the first kind of heat exchanger introduced to a student studying heat transfer. [5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Shell-and-Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
A bundle of tubes is passed through a shell. Heat exchange occurs between the fluid inside the tubes (tube-side) and the fluid outside of the tubes but within the shell (shell-side). Baffles are often used to direct the flow of the shell-side fluids as well as to support the tube bundle. TEMA has set standards for construction of shell-and-tube heat exchangers as well as nomenclature for the front heads (4 types), shells (6 types), and rear heads (8 types). (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three commonly used types of shell-and-tube heat exchangers are: the fixed-tube, U-tube, and floating-head type. Each has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. For example, the fixed-tube type exchanger has the simplest construction, which reduces construction cost and difficulty of routine cleaning. However, it may not be the most efficient. Meanwhile, the U-tube configuration allows more surface area inside the exchanger, but is more difficult to clean. Additionally, the flow pattern is not truly a counterflow pattern unless a longitudinal baffle is used (Type F shell).  The U-tube configuration is more able to absorb the stress of thermal expansion than the fixed tube exchanger. Finally, the floating¬-head exchanger can move within the shell, which allows the exchanger to handle higher temperatures and pressures. However, it is more complex than the former two types, and thus construction can be approximately 25 percent higher for a unit of similar area.(Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tube pitch describes the center-to-center distance for the arrangement of the tube bundle, and can be square or triangular. A larger pitch leaves more space between tubes and allows for easier cleaning, but this comes at the cost of a lower shell-side heat transfer coefficient and the need for a larger shell. A smaller pitch allows more tubes to be fit inside a given shell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Triangular pitch allows for tighter packing of tubes in a shell. If shell-side fouling is a problem, square pitch should be used for easier cleaning. In horizontal boiling heat exchangers, square pitch should also be used to prevent vapor blanketing. Square pitch should also be used when there is a lower shell-side pressure drop. (Towler/UOP)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The baffles lead to increased pressure drop of the shell-side fluid. However, it also improves the mixing of the fluid and increases turbulence, which leads to improved heat transfer. Again, the tradeoff between improved heat transfer and pressures drop is illustrated. The most common type of baffle is the segmental baffle. Other baffles include the disk-and-doughnut, orifice, no-tube-in-window, and triple segmental baffle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scraped-Surface===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scraped-Surface Heat Exchanger.gif|right|40px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crystallization systems and heat transfer involving viscous fluids, fouling may occur rapidly enough to make routine cleaning impractical. In this case, a rotating blade moves over the surface, liberating the deposited material from the surface and allowing it to exit at the bottom of the exchanger. Additionally, the motion of the blade shears the deposited product close to the wall, which results in high local heat transfer rates. Scraped-surface exchangers are generally not considered unless liquid viscosity exceeds 1 Pa•s or fouling is rapid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gasketed and Welded Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers consist of a stack of corrugated plates. The corrugation of the plates improves rigidity, controls spacing of the plates, and increases the heat-transfer area compared to a flat plate.The hot and cold streams flow countercurrently through the alternating spaces created by the plates. The modular design allows easy addition of more heat transfer area, but at a cost of increased pressure drop.  Edges can be sealed with gaskets for lower pressures. Cleaning is relatively simple because the configuration can be disassembled and cleaned.  For operating at higher pressures the edges can be welded. Welded-plate heat exchangers typically do not operate past 3 MPa. However, in welding the plates together, the convenience of disassembling and cleaning the modular plates is lost, and cleaning must be done chemically. Additionally, the plates are usually larger than those of the gasketed-plate exchanger to reduce the amount of welding necessary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gasketed-Plate Heat Exchanger.gif|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spiral Plate and Tube===&lt;br /&gt;
Spiral plates are coiled to create alternating passages for the fluids. The cold fluid enters at the periphery and flows towards the center, while the hot fluid enters at the center and flows outward. Introducing the cold fluid at the periphery reduces or eliminates the need for external insulation. These heat exchangers are used for small capacities with viscous, fouling, and corrosive fluids. The end plates can be removed for cleaning the shell. However, the configuration of the tube makes the spiral plates difficult to clean.[[File:Spiral Plate and Tube Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate-Fin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate-fin heat exchangers consist of layers of corrugated metallic sheets (fins) between flat plates to form the flow passages. The plates are sealed with metal bars on the side. Plate-fin heat exchangers can be 9 times as compact as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, and weighs less. Can withstand design pressures up to 6 MPa in the temperature range of -270 and 800 ⁰C. Many different configurations of plate-fin exchangers can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Plate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plate.jpg|right|150px]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by two pressure plates into a &amp;quot;plate pack.&amp;quot; Fluid paths within a plate heat exchanger alternate between the plates, allowing the fluids to transfer heat in a small area without mixing. Plates are generally corrugated in order to increase the heat transfer area (surface area) and turbulence, and thus maximize the amount of heat transfer completed. Plate heat exchangers expose fluids to a larger surface area compared to a conventional heat exchanger such as a double pipe or a shell and tube. The fluids are spread out over the plates, increasing the rate of temperature change significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
There are four types of plate heat exchangers: brazed plate, welded, semi-welded, and gasketed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Gasketed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gasketed plate exchangers use high quality gaskets to seal plates together and protect against leakage. Maintenance and repairing costs are generally low due to the simplicity of removing the plates. Additionally, gasketed plate heat exchangers allow for increased flexibility in industrial settings, as plates can be added and removed easily to increase or decrease heat transfer as necessary (useful if fouled). Also, plates of the same type can be used in heat exchangers of the same size, so one set of backup plates can be used in all heat exchangers of the same size.&lt;br /&gt;
Common industrial applications of this type of heat exchanger include HVAC, pharmaceutical, and dairy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Brazed Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazed plate exchangers are generally used in refrigeration applications. They are highly resistant to corrosion due to its copper brazing and stainless steel plate composition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Welded Plate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Welded plate exchangers have plates that are welded together, making them extremely durable and ideal for high temperatures and corrosive material. However, mechanical cleaning of plates is not an option due to the plates being welded together, so maintenance and repairing costs will be significantly higher. Common industrial applications that use this type of plate heat exchanger include hazardous liquids, process chemicals, and oil cooling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Semi-Welded&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Semi-welded exchangers show a mixture of the welded and gasketed plates. Pairs of two plates are welded together, and gasketed to other pairs of plates. Thus, one fluid path is welded while the other path is gasketed. A benefit of having this type of exchanger is that it is able to transfer more corrosive and high temperature fluids, while having the accessibility of cleaning the plates relatively easily. There is also a very low risk of fluid loss with this type of exchanger, and thus, it is recommended to use this type of heat exchanger when transferring materials that are expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are certain limitations to plate heat exchangers. Heat transfer between two liquids of large temperature differences are not very efficient, and it is generally better to use a shell and tube heat exchanger instead. There is also a possibility of high pressure loss due to turbulence created from the narrow flow channels, so applications requiring low pressure loss should not be considered. [4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Design Considerations for Plate Heat Exchangers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with any heat exchanger type, there are several important design factors to consider when designing a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. These factors include temperature approach, pressure drop, number of passes, channel velocity, plate gap, and plate thickness, and corrugation arrangement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important factor is temperature approach. Approach temperature capabilities are better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers, with minimum approach temperatures of 1-3 F. However, it is important to note that smaller approach temperatures necessitate more plates - and thus increase cost. If the freedom to choose approach temperature exists, approach temperatures of 5-10 F are ideal for design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pressure drop is an important consideration, as smaller gaps in the heat exchanger result in higher pressure drops than other exchangers. Generally, the pressure drop increases with number of plates and flow rate through the exchanger, while decreasing with an increase in number of passes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with shell-and-tube heat exchangers, increasing number of passes decreases the pressure drop in the exchanger, allowing for the addition of heat transfer area without reaching maximum pressure drop. When considering increasing the number of passes, plate heat exchangers allow for flexibility. Odd number of passes must have opposite inlet and outlet connections, and even number passes must have same side inlet and outlet connections. However, adding another two passes only requires the addition of two &amp;quot;turn plates&amp;quot; - which are plates lacking holes on the side which is being passed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Channel velocities are important to reduce fouling between plates. Since there is a small gap between plates, a small amount of fouling can significantly reduce heat transfer. Although increasing plate gap can lengthen the amount of time between cleanings, increasing channel velocity allows a small gap to be retained, while still increasing time between cleanings. However, channel velocities that are too high can increase the risk for a blowout. For most design applications, 1-2 ft/s allow for reduced fouling while ensuring safe operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PlatePatterns.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plate gap is exactly as it sounds - the gap between two plates. Typical gaps between plates range from 1.3 - 1.5 mm. Increasing the gap between plates reduces velocity and decreases pressure drop, but decreases heat transfer as there is more fluid that does not contact either side of the plate. Plate gap can be adjusted in industry by tightening or loosening the end bolts on the heat exchanger - although overtightening can lead to crushing, and undertightening can result in leaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with plate gap, increasing plate thickness decreases heat transfer. From heat transfer, a greater wall thickness increases resistance to heat transfer. However, when working with abrasive or corrosive fluids, thicker plates can be necessary for safety purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, chevron arrangement affects heat transfer. Each manufacturer configures corrugation patterns differently, with some companies offering multiple styles. In general, however, increasing the chevron angle decreases the heat transfer and the pressure drop. Therefore, altering chevron angle is another way use the trade off between heat transfer and pressure drop limitations. For the two plates shown on the right, the left plate has a high angle, and therefore higher heat transfer and higher pressure drop. Unfortunately, each company has a specific, proprietary arrangement and design of corrugation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Simulation Environments for Exchanger Design&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As seen above, there are many different factors to consider when designing a plate heat exchanger. To aid in design, there are several simulation packages available. Aspen has design software available (developers of HYSYS) that allows for performance simulation of gasketed, welded, and brazed heat exchangers. It also can provide optimum heat exchanger configuration. [5] Xphe also has a simulation package available that allows for heat exchanger design and analysis. It also allows for different chevron angles to be specified, as well as non-newtonian fluids. Both programs have an extensive bank of fluids and the ability to specify an original fluid not in memory. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gas-to-Gas===&lt;br /&gt;
Gas-to-gas heat exchangers are primarily used to recover energy from combustion gases to preheat furnace air. The plain tube gas-to-gas heat exchanger is a simple countercurrent exchange through a tube bank, either in a single-pass (cross-flow) or multipass configuration. (Peters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gas-to-Gas Heat Exchanger.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Boiling and Condensing Heat Transfer=&lt;br /&gt;
Heat transfer involving boiling liquids or condensing vapor is different from heat transfer involving constant fluid phases. Heat transfer operations that involve phase changes are typically carried out in separate units in order to account for the different physical properties of the phases. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Boiling Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers transfer heat to boil liquids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Boiling Heat Transfer Regimes.PNG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boiling liquids have different heat transfer regimes.&lt;br /&gt;
I: Heat transfer with natural convection&lt;br /&gt;
II: Heat transfer with bubbling agitation&lt;br /&gt;
III: Heat transfer with nucleate boiling with unstable film&lt;br /&gt;
IV: Heat transfer with stable film boiling&lt;br /&gt;
V: Radiant Heat Transfer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heat transfer coefficient of a boiling liquid begins to decrease with the onset of film boiling. One method of improving the overall heat transfer coefficient is to use high-flux tubing, which utilizes a porous coating inside of tubes. It can improve boiling performance up to 10 times over a bare tube, and overall performance 2 to 5 times over a bare tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kettle Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kettle Reboiler.png|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kettle reboilers are often used as a steam generator. Pool boiling is used in kettle reboilers. In pool boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and natural convection. The vapor-liquid separator is built-in and allows for blowdown. The weir helps to maintain the liquid level above the tube bundle. It also helps to prevent the entering bubble point liquid (distillation bottoms) from mixing with the residual reboiled liquid (exiting from the bottom). Kettle reboilers are more expensive than horizontal thermosiphons fabricated for a comparable duty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thermosiphon Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thermosiphon reboilers use flow boiling. In flow boiling, agitation occurs through bubbling and forced convection at high velocities. They can be located at a height below the column sump. This allows the static head of the sump to force the column bottoms into the reboiler, which is designed for about 25 to 33% vaporization per pass. Thermosiphon reboilers can be vertical (tube-side) or horizontal (shell-side flow). Horizontal thermosiphon reboilers tend to be cheaper than vertical thermosiphons, but vertical thermosiphons are better at handling dirty fluids.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Thermosiphon Reboiler Flow Regimes.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow is critical in a thermosiphon reboiler, and the different flow regimes will impact operation. The different flow regimes are caused by the increasing vapor/liquid ratio as the fluid passes through the thermosiphon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flow regimes in order of increasing vapor/liquid ratio: nonboiling &amp;lt; subcooled boiling &amp;lt; bubble flow &amp;lt; slug flow &amp;lt; churn flow &amp;lt; annular and mist flow &amp;lt; mist flow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slug flow is unavoidable, but should be minimized. It causes noise and vibration in the thermosiphon. Annular and mist flow are also undesirable. Annular flow can be avoided by designing for less than 33% vaporization, and mist flow can be altogether avoided in well-designed reboilers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stab-in Reboilers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stab-in Reboiler.jpg|right|75px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stab-in reboilers are essentially the heat exchange tube bundle fitted inside a sump. In this case, the sump behaves in a similar capacity to a kettle reboiler, and mechanism of pooling is again pool boiling. It is important that there is enough space in the sump for good level control and to contain the entire tube bundle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Condensing Heat Transfer==&lt;br /&gt;
Condensing heat transfer is important because many heat transfer applications will condense the steam used as the hot stream, and often gaseous products are needed in liquid form. There are two types of condenser: total condensers and partial condensers. Both total and partial condensers need to account for the accumulation of noncondensable vapor. This can be done by venting through the top of the exchanger. The tube bundle arrangement affects overall heat transfer as well. Falling condensate from higher to lower tubes increases local turbulence and thus the heat transfer coefficient. However, condensate that collects on a tube and has yet to drain prevents the cooled heat transfer surface from contacting the vapor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Total Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Total Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a total condenser, all the vapor that enters is condensed as a film on the heat transfer surface. The heat transfer coefficient is determined only by the thermal resistances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Partial Condenser===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partial Condenser Heat Transfer.JPG|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a partial condenser, not all of the vapor that enters is condensed. This allows for vapor-liquid separation. However, there will be a a vapor film with a higher concentration of high-boiling products. The heat transfer coefficient is not determined solely by the thermal resistance, but also in part by the mass transfer resistance as well. The condensable component of vapor will have to diffuse through the noncondensable component. The resistance to diffusion leads to a much lower overall heat transfer coefficient. Additionally, it complicates the calculation of heat transfer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Heaters and Coolers=&lt;br /&gt;
It is not always possible to couple process streams for heat-exchange. It is likely that separate heaters and coolers will have to be used in addition to a heat-exchange network for a process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Heaters==&lt;br /&gt;
Operating temperatures can be classified into three ranges: low (&amp;lt; 120C), medium (120-250C), and high (&amp;gt;250C). low temperature-range heaters generally tend to use condensate or steam, medium temperature-range heater tend to steam, and high temperature-range heaters tend to use fired heaters or hot oil loops (&amp;lt;400C)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Temperature and required heat load are important factors in selecting a heater.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fired Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
Fired heaters are used for heating up to high temperatures. They are able to reach these high temperatures because they generate energy by combustion of natural gas, fuel oil, or process off-gas. Fox example, they are used to generate heat for hot oil loops or steam generators (boilers). Hot oil can be used up to 600F (35C), and fired heaters provide a way to reach those temperatures. High pressure steam, used for utilities, is approximately 480F (250C).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because fired heaters carry out combustion, factors such as pollutant emissions and excess air feed need to be accounted for in addition to the required heat duty. Reducing emissions can incur substantial additional costs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common types of fired heaters include cabin heaters, U-tube heaters, and vertical cylindrical heaters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Electric Heaters===&lt;br /&gt;
In electric heaters, heat is generated by running electricity through wires of high resistance. Heat is exchanged with fluid passed over axially through MgO insulation. The maximum duty that is typically obtained from electric heaters is approximately 1 MW.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantage of electric heaters include: the ability to reach very high temperatures (up to 1200F), no cross-leakage (because only one fluid is being used), good control (because of electrical system), no site emissions (initial power generation occurring elsewhere), and applicability in cyclic operations (metal cycles are not constantly used and/or fouled). However, disadvantages of electric heaters include: both higher capital and operating costs (equipment  purchase and paying for electricity), and the large voltages make them extremely hazardous if they are not properly installed, operated, and maintained.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Steam Generators===&lt;br /&gt;
Steam is typically the primary source of heat in processes. Steam used for this purpose is generated in boilers. The heat used to generate steam comes from combustion of natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, or heating oil (commonly #2 or #6).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Often, high-pressure steam is generated in boilers. As it moves through a plant, it can be expanded in turbines to recover energy. Most plants use more than one level of steam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boilers are typically sold as packaged units. The two main types are water-tube and fired-tube.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Coolers==&lt;br /&gt;
If heat cannot be recovered directly through exchange with another process stream, high-temperature heat can still be recovered by generating steam or preheating the feed water to the boiler. This way at least some energy is recovered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Water and air are used for most cooling applications because they are available in large quantities at minimal cost. A comparison between the two makes the tradeoffs easily apparent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Air Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of air coolers are that they do not require additional infrastructure, and air is free so that the only operating cost is the electricity for the fans. Additionally, it is easy to add extra capacity for a higher duty. However, air coolers have much lower heat transfer coefficients compared to water coolers, and as a result can take up a lot of space. They can also lead to over-cooling depending on external temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air coolers can use forced or induced draft. In forced draft, air is pushed up through the tubes by fans, located below. In induced draft, air is pulled up through the tubes, by fans located above. &lt;br /&gt;
Forced draft air coolers allow easier access for maintenance, and allows recirculation of air for winterizing. Induced draft air coolers have better air distribution and less air recirculation, as well as a better natural draft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water Coolers===&lt;br /&gt;
Water coolers require extensive infrastructure (pipes, cooling towers, water treatment) in order to provide water for cooling. Depending on the location, cheap water is not always available, and it is expensive to add capacity to handle an increased duty. Also, fouling is a problem. However, they have much higher heat transfer coefficients than air coolers, and thus are more compact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Refrigeration===&lt;br /&gt;
Refrigeration is used for very low temperatures (&amp;lt;40C). (Towler/UOP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Uses in Industry=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heat exchangers are widely seen across various types of industry, mainly for heating and cooling large processes. Depending on the process, the type and size of heat exchanger can be tailored depending on certain factors. These factors include the types of fluid that will engage in heat transfer, the phase, densities, temperatures, pressures, and various other thermodynamic properties of the fluids. Heat exchangers can save companies a lot of money by reusing the energy or heat in a waste stream and using it to heat or cool a different stream in the process that is vital. This recycling of energy saves the company a significant amount of money, as well as preserves the environment from wasting more energy. [6]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many industries that utilize heat exchangers, including the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Waste Water Management&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Oil, Gas, and Petroleum Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Chemical Processing&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Cryogenic Air Separation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Power Generation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Refrigeration&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1=&lt;br /&gt;
A stream of hot fluid at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{h, in}=120 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; flowing at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; needs to be cooled to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=60 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Its heat capacity is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,h}2=\frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A cold stream at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,in}=50 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is available to cool it. The heat capacity of the old stream is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C_{p,c}=3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. If they are contacted in a true counter current pattern in a double tube heat exchanger with overall heat-transfer coefficient &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U = 2\frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, what is the outlet temperature of the cold stream, and what is the area A needed for this heat exchange rate?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 1 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
We are trying to solve for two things in this problem: the &#039;&#039;&#039;outlet temperature of the cold stream &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;. In order to find the outlet temperature &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we need to find the total heat transfer rate, which is equal to the amount of energy lost by the hot stream. The amount of energy gained by the cold stream is the opposite of this value. The absolute value of either will give the heat duty &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;We can then relate the energy change to the temperature change using the heat capacity and mass flow rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q = -\dot{m_h}C_{p,h}(T_{h, out}-T_{in})=\dot{m_c}C_{p,c}(T_{c,out}-T_{c,in})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in values&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1200 \frac{kJ}{s}= -(10 \frac{kg}{s}) (2 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (60^oC-120^oC)=(8 \frac{kg}{s}) (3 \frac{kJ}{kg\cdot^oC}) (T_{c,out}-50^oC)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}=100 ^oC&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T_{c,out}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is solved, we can calculate the log mean temperature driving force &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}=\frac{(T_{h,out}-T_{c,in})-(T_{h,in}-T_{c,out})}{ln\frac{T_{h,out}-T_{c,in}}{T_{h,in}-T_{c,out}}}=\frac{(60 ^oC-50 ^oC)-(120 ^oC-100 ^oC)}{ln\frac{60 ^oC-50 ^oC}{120 ^oC-60 ^oC}}=14.427&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plugging in our values for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;U&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Delta{T_m}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can obtain the heat-exchange area &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Q=1200 \frac{kJ}{s}=UA\Delta{T_m}=(2 \frac{kJ}{m^2\cdot^oC\cdot{s}})(A)(14.43)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From this we are able to obtain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A=41.58 m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2=&lt;br /&gt;
From the area calculated in Example Problem 1, determine the number of plates and channel velocities for a plate-and-frame heat exchanger. Are these numbers reasonable?&lt;br /&gt;
Use an M10-M plate heat exchanger, with a maximum heat transfer area of 90 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Assume &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_h=1000&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_c=900&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{kg}{m^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at T_avg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Example Problem 2 Solution=&lt;br /&gt;
First, include a 10% design factor, so design area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;DA=1.10*A=45.73m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the size of each plate. From literature, we find that each plate has a heat transfer area of 0.24 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and dimensions of 1.0 m high by 0.47 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
Divide design area by area per plate to determine number of plates, N.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;N=\frac{DA}{A_p}=190.54&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; plates, which rounds to 191 plates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of plates seems high, but not unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next determine the channel velocity:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, determine the number of hot channels and cold channels, where the number of channels, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;C=\frac{N+1}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We find C = 96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_h}=10 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{m_c}=8 \frac{kg}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we determine volumetric flow rates for hot and cold streams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_h}=\frac{10\frac{kg}{s}}{1,000\frac{kg}{m^3}}=0.01&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\dot{q_c}=\frac{8\frac{kg}{s}}{900\frac{kg}{m^3}}=8.89*10^{-3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{m^3}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Determine the channel velocity by dividing volumetric flow rate by the cross-sectional area through which fluid is passing, which is equivalent to the width of the plate times the distance between plates, which we will assume to be 1.5 mm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cross-sectional area, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A_c=0.47m*0.00015m=7.05*10^{-5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We determine that the channel velocities are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,h}=\frac{0.01\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=142\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;v_{ch,c}=\frac{8.89*10^{-3}\frac{m^3}{s}}{A_c}=126\frac{m}{s}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
these velocities greatly exceed the design values of 1-2 feet per second, and are therefore unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Conclusions=&lt;br /&gt;
Efficient use of thermal energy is critical in chemical processes, many of which include energy-intensive separations. How heat is used has a significant impact on process economics, and it is desirable to find ways to reduce its consumption. Heat exchangers provide a way to reduce energy consumption by taking advantage of process stream conditions and coupling streams that need to be heated with those that need to be cooled. Although use of heating and cooling utilities may be inevitable, their loads can be reduced through efficient heat-exchange networks. Proper selection and design of both heat exchangers and utilities equipment is important, and is dependent on many factors. A major problem that occurs with heat exchangers is fouling. Deposits on heat transfer surfaces can lead to reductions in efficiency. Routine maintenance is important, and the ease with which this is done also play a major part in equipment selection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=References=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1] Towler, G.P. and Sinnot, R. (2012). &#039;&#039;Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design.&#039;&#039;Elsevier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[2] Biegler, L.T., Grossmann, L.E., and Westerberg, A.W. (1997). &#039;&#039;Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design.&#039;&#039; Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[3] Peters, M.S. and Timmerhaus, K.D. (2003). &#039;&#039;Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th Edition.&#039;&#039; New York: McGraw-Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[4] (www.separationequipment.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[5] (http://htfs.aspentech.com/software/compact/plate_soft.asp)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[6] (https://www.htri.net/xphe.aspx)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[7] (www.brighthubengineering.com)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[8] Fraas, A. (1989). &#039;&#039;Heat Exchanger Design, 2nd Edition.&#039;&#039; John Wiley &amp;amp; Sons.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Msl333</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>