Engineering economic analysis

Authors: Michael Gleeson, ^[2014] Sean Kelton, ^[2014] Thomas Considine, ^[2014] and Tahir Kapoor ^[2015]

Stewards: David Chen, Jian Gong, and Fengqi You

Date Presented: Feb. 22, 2014

Measures of Economic Return

The following are "back of the envelope" type calculations for economic return of a project. These measures are quick and easy because they ignore some of the more complicated parts of evaluating a project including factors such as depreciation, time value of money and taxes.

Payback Time

The payback time is defined as the period of time (in years) required to break even on the initial economic investment. It is given by the equation:

$T=I/C$

Where $T$ is the payback time for the project, $I$ is the total investment required for the project and $C$ is the average annual cash flow generated by the project. This calculation is used to determine how quickly the project's fixed costs (i.e. land, machinery, etc.) can be recovered from the project. A small payback period is desirable for a new project.

Return on Investment

The regular return on investment (ROI) involves complicated tax and depreciation calculations. However, the pre-tax ROI is much simpler. It is given by the equation:

$ROI=C/I$

Where ROI in this case is the pre-tax ROI, C is the pre-tax cash flow generated by the project and I is the total investment required fro the project. This calculation, as it sounds, is a measure of the percentage return on the initial investment required for a project (typically the fixed costs, explained above). A higher ROI is a more profitable project.

Project Cash Flows

Project cash flows, much like it sounds, are the annualized cash flows, or revenue, generated from a new project. The first year of a project's cash flow is typically negative because the money is spent on initial investment. At first there will be a small expenditure on research and design expenses from engineering. Once the design is finished and construction is set to begin the expenditures will rapidly increase. These expenses may include things such as initial cost of renting or purchasing space/land, equipment & materials, initial labor to build a plant, etc. All in all research, design, procurement and construction, all which must be done prior to start up, will typically take 2-4 years. At this point the project will have reached maximum investment and typically has the most negative sum of cash flows.

The first year after start up, cash flows begin to become positive, however, the cash flows in the first year are usually reduced comparatively to years after. This is due to unexpected problems within the project/process. Typically machine down time, maintenance,etc. will be greatest in this year, causing the project to run under capacity. After the first year all of the problems within a process have begun to be discovered and resolved and so the process can run at full capacity with increase cash flows. From this point on, the only improvements in project cash flows come from process improvements (i.e. six sigma analysis, etc.), however, by using these techniques project cash flows can become greater year over year.

Toward the end of the life of a project, cash flows can begin to tail off in magnitude once again due to outdated equipment, new competition, or other increases in operating costs. Finally when a project is terminated there is a small additional cash flow related to the recovery from any assets such as equipment, land, etc. can all be resold or scrapped, however, there will also be some amount of costs related to deconstruction and land remediation (due to pollution or other harmful project outputs). Typically the recovered assets outweighs these costs.

A typical cash flow diagram of a project relating the cumulative cash flows over the life of the project is shown in the figure below.

Figure 1: Cash Flows Diagram. Taken from ChE 351 powerpoint slide 11 (written by Jennifer Cole) for class instruction. Slides presented on Oct. 5, 2013.

As seen in Figure 1, the cash flows follow the pattern described in the paragraph above. The break even point of the project is the point at which the cash flows cross the x-axis. The life of the project is given by the duration of the graph.

Taxes

Chemical production facilities are subject to the same financial levies by the government as all corporations. Specifically, corporations typically pay income taxes, and may collect incentives based on state and federal regulations. Detailed tax filings are almost always conducted by the accounting or financial department of a corporation. When preparing process economics estimations, taxes should be included, however all final cost estimates reported to management should be prepared by the appropriate specialist (Douglas, 23).

Corporate Taxes

While tax codes can vary from state to state, and from county to county. Looking at the federal tax rate is one measure of the tax rate. Federal tax rates for different income are detailed in the table below. It is important to note that taxes are levied on income only and not on revenue. ^[1]

Taxable Income ($)	Tax Rate
0 to 50,000	15%
50,000 to 75,000	$7,500 + 25% Of the amount over 50,000
75,000 to 100,000	$13,750 + 34% Of the amount over 75,000
100,000 to 335,000	$22,250 + 39% Of the amount over 100,000
335,000 to 10,000,000	$113,900 + 34% Of the amount over 335,000
10,000,000 to 15,000,000	$3,400,000 + 35% Of the amount over 10,000,000
15,000,000 to 18,333,333	$5,150,000 + 38% Of the amount over 15,000,000
18,333,333 and up	35%

Many companies have much lower effective tax rates due to tax breaks and loopholes. When deducting taxes, simply assuming a corporate tax rate of 35% can greatly overestimate the amount of taxes that a company pays. A better estimation of tax rates would be to find the effective tax rate of similar publicly traded corporations. The tax rate of any publicly traded company can be found on their quarterly reports (Form 10-Q) or their annual reports (Form 10-K) filed with the SEC. Below are some effective tax rates of major chemical companies for 2014 (2013 for The Dow Chemical Company). ^[2]

Tax Rate of Selected Chemical Companies

Company	Tax Rate
The Dow Chemical Company	29.2%
Exxon Mobil Corporation	41%
Monsanto Company	28%

Investment Incentives

Local, state, and federal governments generally encourage capital investments by corporations. Financial incentives afforded to corporations include low interest loans, free capital for research and development, and tax holidays for new technologies.

When conducting economic estimates of a chemical process plant, especially if the plant utilizes efficient or "green" technology, it is important to investigate any and all sources of government incentives.

Depreciation

Depreciation, in the colloquial sense, is the loss of value of an item. As it pertains to the chemical process industry, depreciation is the loss of value due to "wear and tear" of the components and facilities of the plant. It is important to note that this does not include working capital or land.

Economics of Depreciation

Depreciation can be thought of as a yearly expense that the plant incurs. It can then be considered a cost, effectively reducing the income and thus the income tax. However, depreciation is not an actual cash flow. There is no transfer of money.

Note how depreciation lowers the amount of taxes:

$T=(P-D)*t$

where $T$ is the taxes due; $P$ is the gross profit; $D$ is the depreciation; and $t$ are the taxes due.

Two commons methods of calculating depreciation are discussed in the next sections.

Straight Line Depreciation

Straight line depreciation is the most common method of approximating depreciation when calculating profitability measures, such as return on investment (Seider, 392).

In this method, the depreciable value $Cd$ is written off over the total life of $n$ years at a constant linear rate:

$Di=Cd/n$, where $i$ is each year in the lifetime.

Therefore, the book value $Bm$, or the initial cost of the item minus the accumulated depreciation charges, at year $m$, can be defined as:

$Bm=C-m*Cd/n$ where $C$ is the initial cost of the item.

Depreciation Case Study

For example, let us find the book value after 3 years of a compressor which originally costs $50,000, has a depreciable value of $5,000, and has a lifetime of 20 years.

$Di=5,000/20=250$

$Bm=\$50,000-250*3=\$49,250$

Therefore we can say that over the three years, the compressor has cost the process a difference of $750, which can be taken out of the taxable income.

Time Value of Money

Money that is available now is inherently more valuable than the same amount in the future, because that money could be used as capital for an investment that earns interest.

Capital that is available in the future is said to be "discounted". The present value of money, which is discussed in further detail in the coming sections, is a discounted amount of the future value:

$PV=FV*DF$.

Where $PV$ is the Present value, $FV$ is the Future value, and $DF$ is the discount factor.

The discount factor, which takes into account an estimated interest rate gained on present money, is calculated for every year $n$:

$DF=1/(1+i)^{n}$.

This implies that the a given amount of money in the future has less value as the length of future time increases, and as the expected amount of interest that current capital could gain increases. See Net Present Value for more information on this subject.

Of additional interest is the different between the time value of money and inflation. It is important to note that these two concepts are completely different. Inflation is the yearly rate at which the price of a certain good will increase (Biegler, 169). Although the mathematics and calculations are similar, inflation is generally a result of socioeconomic factors increasing the supply of money, and not the potential interest rate gained on current capital.

Discounted Cash Flow Methods

As discussed above, the value of money is directly related to time, insofar as $500 today is worth more than $500 in two years. Discounted cash flow methods, such as net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) take the time value of money into account. The main difference between nondiscounted and discounted cash flows is that all cash flows are related to time zero in the latter.(Turton 266).

Net Present Value

Net Present Value (NPV), also known as Net Present Worth (NPW), gives the present value of all payments and provides a basis of comparison for projects with different payment schedules but similar lifetimes. (Biegler 151). In making comparisons between projects, the larger the net present worth, the more favorable the investment. (Peters 328). It is one of the most widely used economic measures because it captures the time value of money, the value of investment incentives and variations in construction schedule, while allowing for price forecast models that include cyclic behavior. The NPV can be represented as:

$NPV=\sum _{n=1}^{n=t}{\frac {CF_{n}}{\left(1+i\right)^{n}}}$

where $CF_{n}$ = cash flow in year n and $t$ = project lifetime and i is the discount rate as a decimal. (Towler 407). If the net present value is equal to zero, the return of the project is equal to the return that the discount rate would provide. (Peters 328). There are several drawbacks to NPV; it does not measure bang for buck, and it cannot be optimized unless an upper bound is set to the plant size.

Discounted Cash Flow Rate of Return

The DCFROR is the interest or discount rate for which the NPV is equal to zero. (Turton 270). This means that DCFROR represents the highest after tax interest rate at which the project can break even. Often, corporation management will set an "internal" interest rate, which is the lowest rate of return that a company will accept for any new investment. If the DCFROR is greater than this internal rate, the investment is favorable. NPV and DCFROR are almost always used together. (Peters 328). The DCFROR can be represented as:

$\sum _{n=1}^{n=t}{\frac {CF_{n}}{\left(1+i'\right)^{n}}}=0$

where i' is the DCFROR. DCFROR is useful for comparing projects of different sizes and for comparing projects to other investments. (Towler 408).

Discounted Payback Period

DPP is the time required, after start-up, to recover the fixed capital costs required for a project with all cash flows discount back to time zero. (Turton 268). The project with the shortest discounted payback period is the most desirable.

Annualized Costs

Annualized Cost is another way of comparing capital expenses with future cash flows where the capital expense is converted into a recurring annual capital charge. It is useful for comparing the cost of assets with different lifetimes. (Towler 411). This is very similar to the way that mortgages are amortized over a 15 or 30 year lifetime. Annual payment can be represented as:

$A=P\,{\frac {i\,\left(1+i\right)^{n}}{\left(1+i\right)^{n}-1}}$

where P is the principle investment, n is investment period, and i is the discount rate. The annual capital charge ratio can be defined as:

$ACCR=A/P$

It is the fraction of the principle that must be paid each year to recover the investment at the target interest rate.

Estimating the Discount Rate

Small changes in the discount rate, can cause large fluctuations in future cash flow. When projecting project cash flows many years in the future it is essential that an accurate discount rate is chosen to get a reasonable cost estimation. A simple estimation of the discount rate is to set it equal to the interest rate received from cash deposits. $D=i$ This simple estimation will often yield a result greatly under a value needed for a good cost estimations because in the modern financial economy, cash deposits yield minimal interest rates. Many other forms of higher yielding securities are available to investors and a good discount rate should combine the interest from many different sources rather than just cash deposits.

Weighted- Average Cost of Capital. (WACC)

The weighted average cost of capital is a rate that a company is expected to pay to all of its shareholders to finance all of its assets and liabilities (debt, equity, etc.). The WACC is not a rate set by management, but is rather an implied rate that the company must return to shareholders or else they will start selling shares to invest elsewhere and depress the company’s value. Due to this reason, WACC rates for the same company can be evaluated to different estimations depending on calculation method.

Generally, WACC is described by the following formula: ^[3]

${\text{WACC}}={\frac {\sum _{i=1}^{N}r_{i}\cdot MV_{i}}{\sum _{i=1}^{N}MV_{i}}}$

where $N$ is the number of sources of capital (securities, types of liabilities); $r_{i}$ is the required rate of return for security $i$; and $MV_{i}$ is the market value of all outstanding securities $i$.

The WACC is often simplified to include only debt and equity. Thus it can be written as

${\text{WACC}}={\frac {E}{E+D}}r_{e}+{\frac {D}{E+D}}r_{d}$

where $E$ is the total market value of shareholder’s equity, $D$ is the total market value of debt, $r_{e}$ is the cost of equity, and $r_{d}$ is the cost of debt. ^[4]

Cost of Equity

The cost of equity is analogous to the returns that shareholders expect in return from giving a company their equity through share purchases.

$r_{e}=r_{f}+(\beta )RP$

where $r_{f}$ is the risk free rate of return that investors in stable securities such as US treasury bonds can expect. $\beta$ is a commonly used factor describing the company’s stock’s correlation with the general market. $RP$ is the risk premium, the rate of return that investors expect by investing in a stock rather than a more stable class of security. A risky company will have a higher risk premium. ^[5]

Cost of Debt

The cost of debt, $r_{d}$, is either a fixed or variable rate that a company pays to a lender. This rate has been renegotiated and can be easily looked up. Since debt is tax deductible, taxes are often discounted.

WACC equation

${\text{WACC}}={\frac {E}{E+D}}(r_{f}+(\beta )RP)+{\frac {D}{E+D}}(r_{d}(1-T))$

Where $\ T$ is the tax rate.

Many of the inputs required to calculate WACC can be easily obtained from a publicly traded company’s financial statements. An example of some WACCs of major chemical companies as of 2/6/15 are shown in the following table. ^[6]

WACC of Selected Chemical Companies

Company	WACC
The Dow Chemical Company	7.01%
Exxon Mobil Corporation	11.64%
Monsanto Company	9.23%

Conclusion

Measures of economic return are vital in the design phase of an engineering project. Companies will perform simulations to project capital and operating cost expenditures along with revenue generation, and use the resulting data to perform economic analyses, such as NPV and payback period. Based on the results of this analysis, the project will either be scrapped or it will be given the go ahead to begin granular design and construction. Measures of economic return provide a quick way for companies to determine the feasibility of a project, and therefore are extremely valuable.

References

1. Form 1120 Instructions for 2012 page 17
2. "EDGAR Search Results." EDGAR Search Results. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, n.d. Web. 06 Feb. 2015.
3. Miles, James A.; Ezzell, John R. (September 1980). "The weighted average cost of capital, perfect capital markets and project life: a clarification". Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 15 (3): 719–730.doi:10.2307/2330405.
4. Fernandes, Nuno. 2014, Finance for Executives: A Practical Guide for Managers, p. 32.
5. "DCF Analysis: Calculating The Discount Rate | Investopedia." Investopedia. Investopedia, 03 Jan. 2006. Web. 06 Feb. 2015.
6. Frank, Murray; Shen, Tao (2012). "Investment, Q, and the Weighted Average Cost of Capital".http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2014367.

7. G.P. Towler, R. Sinnott, Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design, Elsevier, 2012.

8. L.T. Biegler, I.E. Grossmann, A.W. Westerberg, Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design, Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, 1997.

9. W.D. Sieder, J.D. Seader, D.R. Lewin, Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation, Wiley: New York, 2004.

10. R.T. Turton, R.C. Bailie, W.B. Whiting, J.A. Shaeiwitz, Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, 2003. 11. M.S. Peters, K.D. Timmerhaus, "Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers", 5th Ed., McGraw-Hill: New York, 2003

12. J.M. Douglas, Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988